Search for: "Johnson v. State of California" Results 1321 - 1340 of 1,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In fact, the quote was fake, published four days earlier in a tweet by user @thereturnofBWA, whose Twitter bio states: “Everything I say is untrue and satire. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Nov. 18, 2008)(Unpublished)Affirming dismissal of termination claim under state lawDC CircuitMontgomery v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:56 am by Joy Waltemath
Summary judgment was thus denied in part (Johnson v Federal Express Corporation, February 10, 2014, Conner, C). [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Events On 29 November 2022, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is hosting a virtual talk on “Contemporary First Amendment Politics” at the California State University. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Eugene Volokh
And there is no First Amendment exception or California anti-SLAPP law exception for 13 Reasons Why. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 9:04 am by David Post
"** ** The court's holding here regarding the level of scrutiny to be applied in this case appears to be in conflict with two other decisions (Johnson v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
, (IPRoo), StemCells files second patent lawsuit against Neuralstem in relation to human neural stem cells: (IPBiz), (IP Law360), (Patent Docs), (California Biotech Law Blog), Patent Reform Act removed from Senate calendar: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IAM), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), Global Global - General New WIPO Director General: Francis Gurry of Australia: (WIPO), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Innovationpartners), (IAM), (Intellectual… [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 4:24 am by SHG
In describing Posner’s challenge to the puzzle, Will Baude refers to Justice Scalia’s concurrence in California v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Danney, Comment, Sacking CEQA: how NFL stadium developers may have tackled the California Environmental Quality Act, 19 PENN STATE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW 131 (2011)Carolyn Davis, Note, Leave it on the field: too expansive approach to evaluating Title IX compliance in Biediger v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Lélos Kai Sia EE (and Others) v GlaxoSmithKline AEVE: (IPKat), US: Bio commends Sen Specter for patent reform stance: (Patent Docs), US: USPTO rules on two of four neural stem cell patents in dispute between StemCells Inc and Neuralstem Inc; parties disagree on how extensively claims amended: (IP Law360), (IPBiz), US: Insmed continues fight for generic biologic approval: (GenericsWeb), Pharma & Biotech - Products Cipralex (Escitalopram) –… [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Johnson forAmici Curiae United Trustee’s Association and California Mortgage Association.Leland Chan for Amicus Curiae California Bankers Association.I. [read post]