Search for: "King v. State"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 6,214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
Q: Are social media companies “state actors”? [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
"In reviewing an administrative agency determination, [courts] must ascertain whether there is a rational basis for the action in question or whether it is arbitrary and capricious" (Matter of Gilman v New York State Div. of Hous. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
"In reviewing an administrative agency determination, [courts] must ascertain whether there is a rational basis for the action in question or whether it is arbitrary and capricious" (Matter of Gilman v New York State Div. of Hous. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 6:56 am
I was just rereading the briefs and arguments in the landmark Myers v. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:53 pm
See also Connell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 2:34 am
Private One of New York LLC
Subscription Required
KINGS COUNTYCivil Practice
Defendants' Granted Dismissal as Service Nullified by Appellate Division's Order Reversal
State of New York v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:22 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 10:19 am
Original Post The Washington State Supreme Court has withdrawn its January Opinion in the long-running Yousoufian v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:07 am
For instance, the orders in Olga Tellis v Bombay Municipal Corporation AIR 1986 SC 180 did not require an appeal to constitutional rights. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
Community College v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:27 am
Trial began Monday with opening remarks in the merger case United States v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:19 am
Here, in Shapsis v Kogan ; 2011 NY Slip Op 50014(U) ; Decided on January 7, 2011 Supreme Court, Kings County ; Demarest, J. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:15 am
UNITED STATES 09-1272 KENTUCKY v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 12:37 pm
King, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 6:41 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
3 May 2015, 6:42 pm
Justice Rouleau stated in O’Donohue v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 10:54 am
In a 6-3 opinion written by notoriously conservative Justice Gorsuch, the United States Supreme Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 covers employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in Bostock v. [read post]
