Search for: "Liberty Legal Foundation"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 2,648
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2016, 11:27 am
We oppose this order, which has implications far beyond the legal case at hand. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:39 am
Recognizing the consequences of this void, the Administration should nominate someone with a strong foundation in national security law to the current vacancy. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
Last year, the ACLU filed a suit challenging Upstream surveillance on behalf of a coalition of educational, legal, media, and advocacy organizations, including the Wikimedia Foundation. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:04 am
Despite increased transparency, as of January 2016, the immense technical and legal complexity of U.S. surveillance law continues to challenge informed debate across all of these fronts. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:46 am
Undermining human rights bodies: reactions to the opinion of the Working Group on Assange It is not the purpose of this commentary to assess the content of the opinion of the Working Group, largely criticised for its shaky legal foundations elsewhere (see for instance: Mathew Happold here, Joshua Rozenberg here, or a more nuanced view by Liora Lazarus here). [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:13 am
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Julio Colomba argues that the Environmental Protection Agency’s recent brief opposing review in American Farm Bureau Federation v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
They ask: if we have a warrant or other legal authority, why should previously-accessible information now be off-limits to us? [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:16 pm
The government has itself declassified numerous relevant documents, including legal analyses and judicial interpretations. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:15 am
What else would it mean in our legal culture to call a right “fundamental”? [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
They sought to reshape the foundational structures and dynamics of both economic and political order. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:00 am
It was easy to keep regarding the Constitution, 1950s-style, as a document of personal liberty and inclusion, the province of courts (which stayed out of the political-economy field). [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am
Pauley, the challenge by a church nursery school that was denied recycled rubber for its playground to a Missouri law that prohibits public funds for religious programs, comes from Lyle Denniston at Constitution Daily and Ethan Blevins at the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 3:40 am
” And at the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Deborah LaFetra argues that a “win for Rebecca Friedrichs is a win for good public policy as well as constitutional rights. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 7:50 am
Before co-founding IJ, Bolick had worked at the Landmark Legal Foundation, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Justice Department. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:15 pm
The Washington Legal Foundation recently published a graphics project/report called “Timeline: Federal Erosion of Business Civil Liberties” that includes sections showing concurrent changes in six areas of law: mens rea, public welfare offenses and the responsible corporate officer doctrine; EPA criminal enforcement policies; DoJ criminal prosecution policies; attorney-client privilege; deferred prosecution and non-prosecution agreements; and proliferation of… [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:25 am
At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Timothy Sandefur discusses the case and urges the Court to grant review. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 3:47 pm
Sarah works for the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (though the opinions expressed here are her own) and is interested in free speech and civil liberties. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 12:35 pm
Oyama stood in the doorway of the teaching profession; he was not at liberty to step inside and break the house rules. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:52 pm
It is, again, a foundational claim in the international law of human rights. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am
At the Liberty Blog of the Pacific Legal Foundation (which represents the respondent in the case), Reed Hopper contends that under the Army Corps of Engineers and “EPA’s new and expansive interpretation of ‘waters of the United States,’ the Act potentially covers literally millions of landowners across the Country” and he adds that PLF looks “forward to litigating this case to vindicate the rights of landowners nationwide. [read post]
