Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2011, 11:45 am
In respect of the former, his Lordship referred inter alia to the decisions in Sentges v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:31 am
Do recent changes to Schedule 7 powers make Beghal v United Kingdom moot? [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 2:23 am
Read more: The ECtHR judgment Our case summary of Carson; Reynolds v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (May 2005 – House of Lords, 2003 – Court of Appeal) Media coverage in The Guardian and on the BBC website [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am
First Division, Inner House, Court of Session Lord Carloway (President), Lord Menzies and Lady Clark of Calton refused the appeals. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
V. issue, pp. 68-82).Ralph R. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 3:10 am
He stated that refusal to permit disclosure to the ECtHR does not constitute a breach of international law. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 2:53 am
Lord Mance gave the lead judgment, with which the other Justices agreed. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:05 am
In delivering the lead judgment Lord Carnwath stated that Asset Land’s activities amounted to operating “collective investment schemes” under section 235 of the 2000 Act, and were thus “regulated activities” for the purpose of section 19. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
“The People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:09 pm
Central to the case was whether the House of Lords decision in Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC [2003] UKHL 5 covered the issue and whether Runa Begum should be viewed differently in the light of Tsfayo. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:16 am
But a claimant in a defamation or malicious falsehood claim who obtained permission to serve out of the jurisdiction had to limit the claim to alleged publications within England and Wales – a principle re-stated by the House of Lords in Berezovsky v Forbes Inc (No.1) ([2000] 1 WLR 1004) Mr Huda’s only potentially viable cause of action was the publication of the report to the GOC -he had no real prospect of establishing publication to… [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:11 am
Harrow Community Support Ltd v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:00 am
The panel was comprised of Lord Neuberger, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Hodge. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 8:01 am
Lord Sumption has stated "I think that [the guidance] should be re-examined by the Patents Court and the Court of Appeal", so how might this practice vary if Lord Sumption's comments are acted upon, and how might a different policy on stays affect litigation in practice? [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
The Court of Appeal consisting of Lady Justice Arden, Lord Justice Lloyd Jones and Lord Justice Kitchin (who gave the leading judgment) handed down its decision on this point last Wednesday in Comic Enterprises v Twentieth Century Fox Film [2016] EWCA Civ 455 . [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:50 am
Supreme Court judgment In a judgment delivered by Lord Hughes, the Supreme Court unanimously refused Mr Nunn’s appeal. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:21 am
She said The digitisation of the processes will follow as soon as possible for the existing contracts, provided that the Lord Chancellor’s court assessment suggests that the system can cope. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:52 am
Lord Devlin in Hussein v Chong Fook Kam (1970) defined it by saying: ‘suspicion in its ordinary meaning is a state of conjecture or surmise where proof is lacking; ‘I suspect but I cannot prove’…suspicion can take into account matters that could not be put in evidence at all. [read post]
