Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
It is arguable that Article 10 places the state under a positive obligation to provide such access. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 3:13 am
The decision in Crane v Canons Leisure Centre [2007] EWCA Civ 1352 may need to be reversed.All these proposals are designed to reduce costs disputes and reduce the cost of costs disputes. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 1:29 pm
It is a Supreme Court case from 1992, Lee v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:10 pm
In Glarum v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 1:45 am
Indeed, Lord Hope expressly disavows it being a test at all, stating that it is a question of fact for the tribunal. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
Morley & Ors v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
California State Lands Commission (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 549. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:06 am
We mean we cannot have judges legislating lord forbid. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm
Bill Baird remembers the events that produced Eisenstadt v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
However, the CJEU's decision in Roche v Primus rejected this strategy. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 8:36 am
There the Court found assistance from Lord Walker in the House of Lords decision in Synthon v SmithKline Beecham. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
This was essentially an intuitive judgment on principles of fairness which may change with the passage of time, in the context of a statute which creates a discretion (Lord Mustill’s guidance in R v Home Secretary, ex p. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am
Introduction of Lord Falconer’s Bill, and summary of Ross v Switzerland [2013] ECHR 429. [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:42 am
Four cases in the House of Lords or Supreme Court’ at [17] ff. [read post]
