Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 42,354
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2024, 4:40 pm
Prosecutors described the matters as “cold cases. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division could not supply the… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division could not supply the… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:57 am
The Staff also discussed the investment adviser sweep related to the SEC’s amended Marketing Rule (Rule 206(4)-1 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940).[2] Director Shah emphasized the timing of the sweep, occurring one year after the Rule’s compliance date, and the hope that this would prompt other investment advisers to review their policies and procedures and come within compliance of the new rule. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
While different Justices (and, thus, different Courts) have their own thresholds for overturning precedent, it's impossible to imagine that five Justices would be so blindly devoted to precedent that they would vote to follow it, no matter how wrong they consider it. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 2:01 am
There is no black-and-white rule as to what exactly we need to show. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 2:01 am
There is no black-and-white rule as to what exactly we need to show. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
We find no error in this ruling. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 6:29 pm
Clients benefit from the firm’s diverse expertise, which extends beyond drug crime defense to encompass a wide range of criminal defense and litigation matters. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:15 pm
This entails the disclosure of all material information known to be relevant to a matter. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
As such, it fleshes out the Convention’s barebones provisions on environmental impact assessment, capacity building, and technology transfer; replicates the Convention’s dispute resolution system; and draws on the Convention’s jurisdictional rules and principles. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 12:48 pm
Though, there are some instances where evidence is produced late, or a witness or document may be introduced at the last minute to rebut testimony, but that is the exception, not the rule. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 10:52 am
The duty underlies the use of AI systems in matters before the USPTO. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:59 am
” One of the key takeaways from the notice is that existing USPTO rules and policies apply to the use of AI tools in matters before the Office. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:27 am
A test that fails to distinguish hemp from marijuana presumably does not meet the standards for admission into evidence under Rule 702. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:02 am
“We don’t have evidence of that, to my knowledge. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:30 am
Nowhere is this phenomenon more evident than in the Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:36 pm
Further, the lack of expertise by the members of the Bar in private international law-related matters and choice of law rules implies that most, if not all, foreign-related civil and commercial matters would be governed by Indian law in its capacity as the lex fori. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
" (A landmark ruling in Europe's top rights court delivers a watershed moment for climate litigation).The 258 page judgment may be accessed HERE. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
A California ballot initiative sponsored by gig-economy companies called Prop 22, however, partially repealed AB5 for Uber and Lyft drivers, until a court ruled that Prop 22 violated California state constitution requirements. [read post]
