Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 4,606
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2018, 7:50 am
Yet, because of an ambiguity in state and federal copyright laws, artists and copyright owners who created that music receive nothing for the use of their work. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 6:21 am
Its application states that at least 20 countries have site blocking, some with courts (the UK) and some without (Portugal). [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 10:35 am
" Narell v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am
Ultimately, the court says that lesser mental states do not support a finding of contributory liability. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
For example, he argued that peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing of music actually benefitted the music industry in an attempt to thwart legislative intervention to reform the Copyright Act. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 2:58 am
The casual nature of the Instagram photos is innovative to say the least – a commercial advertisement without a sales pitch – but just a hashtag stating: #YeezySeason6. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 1:08 pm
” [Citations]; see also People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:37 am
Justice Scalia provides us with an explanation (Kansas v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Instead of veering towards such a transformation, the government decided to rely once again on its preferred model, stimulating growth through investment, exports and subsidies to state-owned enterprises (SOEs), operating outside of China on a regional scale, via BRI. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 7:51 am
” To bolster its conclusion, the court cited the Second Circuit’s 2016 decision in EMI Christian Music Group v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 3:48 am
The Library of Congress, which is the oldest federal cultural institution in the United States, describes the song as America’s “most powerful song. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
The case deals with two difficult and very interesting questions, the first being whether an ISP can be held liable for infringing activities of its subscribers, more precisely the up- and down-loading of copyright-protected musical works in the BitTorrent-Network. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm
Some 40 or so years later, Chairman Clayton’s regeneration of Judge Sporkin’s gatekeeper liability lays the regulatory foundation for a successful and vast SEC ICO assault, which will leave some ICO lawyers looking over their shoulders, and others perhaps dashing for cover. 1970s: SEC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
Agents of the state asked my name. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Socialist Workers Party v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 4:12 pm
The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:17 am
United States, 517 U. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:30 am
In Pickren v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:17 am
V. [read post]
