Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 9,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
United States by an equally divided court. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
Case date: 21 April 2022 Case number: No. 19-55864 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 2:27 pm
District Judge Virginia Kendall, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, decided that Forte was protected from suit by 47 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 7:49 pm
By MARK ESSIGASHEVILLE, N.C.WHEN the Supreme Court last week granted a stay of execution for a murderer in Mississippi, it imposed a de facto moratorium on capital punishment in the United States. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:47 am
Here is our guide to the amici (we’ve highlighted the must-read briefs in red): The United States: Here. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:28 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Judge Liam O'Grady) affirmed the TTAB's decision of January 20, 2020 [TTABlogged here], dismissing a petition for cancellation of a registration of the mark SHUSTOV & Design (shown below) for various alcoholic beverages. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:01 am
Belmora says that one need not own a trademark in the United States to bring a Section 43(a) claim (Bayer owned the mark FLANAX in Mexico). [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm
Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 77 (1997) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Introduction The end of September marked the close of the 2023 fiscal year for the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Introduction The end of September marked the close of the 2023 fiscal year for the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:02 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
But since it has no home State in the United States, that means that in that situation, there’s no place for plaintiffs to come together and sue that person, correct? [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 8:01 am
,” chapter by Mark Steiner People v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
Mark Gibney;Dr. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
* Swedes consider the "penal value" of a trade mark infringementProsecutor General v CS (Case B-5484-13) is a trade mark infringement ruling where the Swedish Supreme Court addresses criminal consequences of IP infringement. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:52 am
The United States Court of Appeals reversed a district court ruling that ordered cancellation of registrations for the marks LOVELYSKIN and LOVELYSKIN.COM for skin care products and online retail services. [read post]
