Search for: "Matter of Appeal From Civil Penalty"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 2,081
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2024, 12:16 pm
In a big win for privacy, the Ontario Court of Appeal narrowed the power to search digital devices at the border.Why it matters: According to the Customs Act (with some gloss from the courts), border officers don’t need grounds to search electronics like phones and computers. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 12:16 pm
In a big win for privacy, the Ontario Court of Appeal narrowed the power to search digital devices at the border.Why it matters: According to the Customs Act (with some gloss from the courts), border officers don’t need grounds to search electronics like phones and computers. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
This provision takes effect immediately upon enactment of the Act and applies to any civil action commenced on or after that date. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:35 am
For purposes of their appeal to the Supreme Court from a lower court ruling allowing the suit to go forward, the prosecutors accepted the truth of the accusations against them and argued instead that they were entitled to complete immunity from being sued. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 10:08 pm
Such findings may include an indictment, authorizing prosecution of the complaint, civil or criminal, in a court associated with it, by the complainant or his designee, and no individual shall be prosecuted for a crime without an indictment or presentment of an inquestry.6.4.6 Jury. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:48 pm
Either party may appeal the ODA to a civil court of competent jurisdiction. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
Statutes specified the penalties for crimes but nearly always gave the sentencing judge wide discretion to decide whether the offender should be incarcerated and for how long, whether he should be fined and how much, and whether some lesser restraint, such as probation, should be imposed instead of imprisonment or fine. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
Thomas held is an “extraordinary circumstance” equitably excusing a resulting failure to appeal a denial of state habeas relief, is likewise an “extraordinary circumstance” warranting reentry of a judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) where the abandonment caused the failure to appeal a denial of federal habeas relief. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 5:52 am
Justice West ruled the provision unconstitutional: [33] It is my opinion that the subject matter of the legislation in issue is undoubtedly speeding, which the Court of Appeal has defined as an absolute liability offence. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:43 pm
Lower courts have previously blocked this law from taking effect arguing for exclusive federal control over these matters. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:38 am
§ 1701) (IEEPA), which authorizes the U.S. government to impose sanctions and civil and criminal penalties against American residents and companies for violating its sanctions. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
The driver of the other vehicle drove away from the scene. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
The driver of the other vehicle drove away from the scene. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:53 pm
Jumping aboard the new wave of cannabis-related laws, Virginia decriminalized marijuana in 2020, meaning that possession of one ounce or less of marijuana results in a civil penalty up to $25, with no jail time nor a criminal record. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 2:21 pm
This lawsuit wouldn’t appeal to a significant swath of the population in, say, Texas, or even here in Ohio where I am based, but it is straight from the East Sid [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 4:35 pm
A whistleblower is a person who reports a fraud against the government or other criminal or regulatory violation, and may be entitled to a percentage of the money recovered or the penalties imposed under statute (this goes all the way back to the Civil War-era False Claims Act). [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 7:54 pm
Those systems were set up to punish misbehavior by using expulsion from the church as a penalty. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
As part of the agreement, Jenkens & Gilchrist will pay a $76 million civil penalty to the IRS. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 9:57 am
For that matter, why didn't the Court of Appeals or the CCA step in to fix this obvious error before the federal courts ever saw this case? [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
Hurles 12-1472Issue: Whether, under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), state court adjudications are per se unreasonable and not entitled to deference under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
