Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 1321 - 1340 of 16,496
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2012, 11:49 pm by Legal Momma is now The Real UnHousewife
No matter whether your married, boo'ed up, or supa-fly and single...Happy Valentine's / Single's Awareness Day!!! [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Where P’s mark didn’t indicate anything about the goods, no plausible explanation of use of same mark for same goods, so illegitimacy could be presumed. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
, neither of which officially matter because of the outcome, though they’re clearly driving the analysis. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 2:34 am
If the COLOURBLIND case (Pangyrus Ltd v OHIM, RSVP Design Ltd, Case T-257/11) had been a movie, it would have secured a nomination for its intricate screenplay, in the spirit of the recent Academy Awards. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 12:03 pm by M. Scott Koller
Don’t wait until you are in the middle of a data breach crisis to review your incident response plan. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 1:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
The university then changed its Guidelines to clarify that ISU marks could not be used to suggest promotion of certain items, including illegal drugs, and to state under Section 3d that ISU’s name and marks could not be used to imply support or endorsement of a particular position on matters of public concern. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court also concluded that the defendants weren't entitled to recover fees under the New York anti-SLAPP statute, because The Letter concerns "a purely private matter" and was "directed only to a limited, private audience. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 12:22 pm by Jim Dickson
By forcing people with disabilities to compromise these rights, election officials are disenfranchising us and sending the message that our votes don’t matter — and breaking the law. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:42 pm
  The Lanham Act, which codifies US trade mark law, sets forth the various reasons why a mark will not be accepted for trade mark protection, including a mark which "consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute." [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:23 am by Kathleen Hart
Even if you don’t—or financially can’t—pursue trademark registration initially, it is an essential part of your start-up due diligence to investigate whether your proposed name or mark infringes on someone else’s existing trademark. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 4:36 pm
(Charon QC)Don't mess with a Rothschild…. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:57 am by luiza
The case marks another circuit court’s application of the materiality standard announced in Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 10:24 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, the Board dismissed Kellogg's opposition to registration of the mark CINNAMON TOAST CRUNCH for a "cereal derived ready-to-eat food bar. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In particular, Toyota USA doesn’t own the Toyota marks; it is a licensee. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
But the provision does discriminate based on content, because it bars registration of marks based on their subject matter. [read post]