Search for: "Nicely v. United States"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
MC: Yes, I think we have got the balance wrong largely because the cause of action remains a 19th century tort at its core, untroubled by reforms of the kind which have caused the law to evolve in places like the United States, the United Kingdom, and even dear old New Zealand. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 11:23 am
Kronk's ex-wife (and a Chief in the United States Coast Guard), who states (1) he was interested in fanta [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 8:38 pm
” (That’s a nice vague answer. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
These tensions and (mis)alignments are nicely exposed, for example, within the context of relations between Hong Kong, the Mainland, and the international community. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Chubin et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
The United States, like many other functioning democracies, is hardly immune from backsliding and lurching toward autocracy. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 11:30 am
The answer, in my view, is “no,” based largely on Rwanda’s State interference with the ICTR. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm
A very nice piece just popped up on NYTimes "End of an Era for Court and Nation. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:45 pm
§1930 (a) and any other fee prescribed by the Judicial Conference of the United States under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
It is the finest bench, pound for pound in the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm
B.A.S. v S.R.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:35 am
It is a nice supplement to the great recent Faculty Lounge posts on false confessions by Laura Nirider and Brian Gallini. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm
Employees don’t have a right, necessarily, to voluntarily share protected information or your company’s private/ secret information just because law enforcement asks nicely with a badge. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 9:05 am
Nor did the EEOC’s April ruling in Macy v Holder create a new protected class of transgender people, Feldblum said. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
It posits the question "What if instead of ‘Bong Hits 4 Jesus,' the banner had said ‘Bong Stinks 4 Jesus,'" reporting on the oral arguments in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm
Cost – A Case for Fixed-Fee, Unit-Based Pricing – http://bit.ly/L9FILJ (Marc Zamsky) eDiscovery Case Law: Judges Get Annoyed When Lawyers Don’t Play Nice – http://bit.ly/LDquTY (Jason Krause) eDiscovery Drama: Stranger Than Fiction – http://bit.ly/QuvHvw (Matt Miller) How Early Case Assessment Can Drive Effective Arbitrations – http://bit.ly/LytKhp (Julie Anne Halter, Bill Zoellner) How To Manage The Costs Of Big Data In eDiscovery –… [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
v=7G_a_lyGvs0.) [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 8:55 am
Fletcher (known as Buddy) was in a long-term relationship with Hobart V. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:11 pm
If so, how does this differ from Biglaw firms defending, say, Guantanamo Bay detainees who want to bring down the United States? [read post]
