Search for: "Osborn "
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,708
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2009, 2:57 am
Osborne, No. 08-6, slip op. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:06 pm
The DNA test Osborne seeks is a simple one, its cost modest, and its results uniquely precise. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:16 pm
Osborne, No. 08-6 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action seeking the evidence used to convict Defendant of sexual assault for the purposes of DNA testing, summary judgment for Plaintiff is reversed where, assuming Plaintiff's claims could be pursued using Section 1983, he had no constitutional right to obtain post-conviction access to the State's evidence for DNA testing. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:43 am
Osborne, 557 U. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:52 am
Osborne that there is no constitutional right to DNA testing after conviction; whether and in what cirucumstances such testing should be allowed is up to the state legislatures. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 3:44 pm
Such has been the case with the Osborne decision, and it's happened again. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 4:24 am
Osborne, that's the case in which SCOTUS decided last week that people who have been convicted of crimes have no constitutional right to DNA testing that might prove their innocence. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 2:11 am
A number of readers have asked my views on last week's Supreme Court decision in the Osborne case out of Alaska where a slim, 5-4 majority ruled there is no constitutional right to postconviction DNA testing.My first, admittedly parochial thought: Texans needn't particularly care. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 10:08 am
Osborne that a state prisoner has no Fourteenth Amendment Due Process right to access the state's evidence for DNA testing, even where all the parties agree that the testing could... [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 8:25 am
As a state senator, Obama sponsored and lobbied for legislation that gave all inmates a post-conviction right to DNA evidence -- the same right that Osborne asserts in this case. . . . [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:34 am
Osborne that said, in part: "Constitutional rights are only one part of a fair and full system of justice. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 9:00 pm
" And The Anchorage Daily News reports that "Supreme Court says Alaska rapist has no right to DNA test; Chief justice says William Osborne tried to side-step state procedures. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:12 pm
The case involved William Osborne, who was convicted of rape in Alaska years ago. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 12:25 pm
Osborne rather quickly, but I thought I'd share a tentative reaction or two and invite some conversation on the topic. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 9:31 am
Osborne. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:05 pm
Osborne, No. 08-6, at this link. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:03 pm
Osborne, opinion available here. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:26 pm
Osborne’s claim to a new constitutional right of post-conviction access to evidence that might favor the defense. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:54 pm
The Supreme Court ruled today in the Osborne case that there is no inherent Constitutionally protected right to access DNA evidence post-conviction. [read post]
