Search for: "P Plaintiff" Results 1321 - 1340 of 13,770
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2022, 3:55 pm
In fact, the evidence provides a strong reason to conclude that the plaintiff did not know that by signing the documents, she had in fact transferred title. [209]     This is not a situation where it can be argued that, when the plaintiff executed the documents, she understood the consequences of doing so. [210]     Furthermore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff was unaware that title had been transferred until many months… [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm by Elyssa Sternberg
., __ P.3d __, 2022 WL 244731 (Cal., Jan. 27, 2022), the California Supreme Court clarified that whistleblower retaliation claims brought under Labor Code section 1102.5 should not be evaluated under the McDonnell Douglas test, but instead the standard enumerated in Labor Code section 1102.6. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 10:50 am by Eugene Volokh
" "[P]ublic entities discriminate in violation of the Rehabilitation Act if they do not make reasonable accommodations to ensure meaningful access to their programs. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:20 am by David M. McLain
McWhinney’s effect may be that plaintiffs’ attorneys ramp up efforts to bring intentional tort claims. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
Canada A very rare civil jury trial in Manitoba that awarded the plaintiff $500,000 for defamation has been replaced with an award of $50,000 by the Court of Appeal in Manitoba: Chartier v Bibeau 2022 MBCA 5. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:41 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” If the plaintiff can show that the tests, even if reliable, do not establish the proposition asserted by the defendant, “the plaintiff has obviously met its burden” of demonstrating literal falsity. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
So holds a Ninth Circuit panel—with the authoring judge penning a hypothetical dissent, to illustrate his view that the Ninth Circuit's Second Amendment precedents are too malleable. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 12:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
" … "[P]seudonyms are the exception and not the rule, and in order to receive the protections of anonymity, a party must make a case rebutting … the presumption of disclosure. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" That includes a duty not to unreasonably increase the risk of criminal attack: "The conduct of a defendant can lack reasonable care insofar as it foreseeably combines with or permits the improper conduct of the plaintiff or a third party. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 11:24 am by Tim De Chant
The plaintiffs are seeking medical evaluations by independent providers and an injunction preventing Dr. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 10:30 pm by Richard Hunt
She compares herself in this way to the tester plaintiff in Havens Realty v. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 6:25 am by Richard Hunt
Laufer, the tester plaintiff in Laufer v. [read post]