Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 1321 - 1340 of 4,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2019, 10:39 am by Cyberleagle
Comments sections on newspaper websites, or a separate discussion forum run by a newspaper such as in the Karim v Newsquest case would on the face of it be in scope. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Good marketers think precisely the opposite: they segment markets, then go after a segment. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Democratic deficit  One particular concern is the potential for a duty of care supervised by a regulator and based on a malleable notion of harm to be used as a mechanism to give effect to some Ministerial policy of the day, without the need to obtain legislation. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:16 am by Venkat Balasubramani
From this ruling, we got 66 pages of dense judicial-ese that, in the end, tells us precisely nothing helpful. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
How does one show this precise definition? [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:21 am by Kevin Russell
This happened a few terms ago in Visa Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:48 pm by Doorey
Those of us paying close attention predicted that this was a precursor to a law precisely like the one the UCP is now proposing. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:04 pm by Adam Levitin
Professor Peter Conti-Brown of the Wharton School has written a short article for Brookings decrying the Second Circuit’s 2015 Madden v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:41 am by Cyberleagle
Democratic deficit One particular concern is the potential for a duty of care supervised by a regulator and based on a malleable notion of harm to be used as a mechanism to give effect to some Ministerial policy of the day, without the need to obtain legislation. [read post]