Search for: "People v Comfort" Results 1321 - 1340 of 2,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2010, 6:59 am
  While there are still those who believe that the law may and ought to prohibit people from having same-sex sexual relationships, much of the current debate -- particularly after the decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:51 pm by James Ridgway
  A majority of the CAVC held in Carpenter v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm
Merpel adds: for people who like statistics, China ranks 51st in the list of 143 countries from which IP enthusiasts visit the IPKat website. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:40 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
The most visible evidence for that optimism was the NAACP’s desegregation litigation that led to the Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:46 am by INFORRM
In 2009 the National People’s Congress passed a Tort Law. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 10:03 am by Jeff Gamso
  In fact, the Supreme Court held, in Mills v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:53 am by admin
We’re here to help you, make sure you feel comfortable with your case, and to make sure you understand your lawsuit every step of the way. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:34 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
The most visible evidence for that optimism was the NAACP’s desegregation litigation that led to the Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm by CAPTAIN
feature=player_embedded&v=wyx6JDQCslE&oref=http%3A%2F%2Fs.ytimg.com%2Fyt%2Fswfbin%2Fwatch_as3-vfl3J-I2Q.swf&has_verified=1COUNTY COURTTop rated as Exceptionally Qualified: Judge Steve Leifman - 54%Judge Andrea Wolfson - 52%Judge Charlie Johnson - 49%Judge Sam Slom - 47% Lowest Percentage of Unqualified votes: Judge Luise Krieger Martin - 5.10%Judge Leifman - 5.35%Judge Slom - 5.41%Judge Johnson - 5.60%Judge Shelly Kravitz - 5.67% Highest Percentage of… [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Section 2 (2) sets out when people cease to be spouses for the purpose of the Act. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 5:45 pm
After the California Supreme Court's opinion in Barrett v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:27 pm
The answer, in a word, is federalism, and the New Haven story is an interesting although unintended consequence of the 1997 decision in Printz v. [read post]