Search for: "People v Long" Results 1321 - 1340 of 19,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2024, 2:03 pm by Reference Staff
Current DSHS Medicaid community-based programs exist for people with intellectual disabilities, behavioral health needs, and elders and others with long-term disabilities. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
Facts The Raelian Movement (sometimes known as the Raelian church) has long attracted controversy. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Tony Booker (1980)American antislavery law long denied the problem of sexual assault in slavery. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: The case of R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58Victim Fine Surcharges Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in four cases, heard together as R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:39 am by Russ Bensing
Brevity is the soul of wit, and it goes a long way in appellate opinions, too. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by INFORRM
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:20 am by Womenstake blog
In June 2006, we told you about a Supreme Court decision in a case called Burlington Northern v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm by Michael Grossman
The doctors’ time and the procedures were likely billable in full to the county, and while they were invasive and humiliating to Eckert, none of them demonstrably harmed him in the long term. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Oakland Circuit Judge Colleen O'Brien relied on the now-reversed Court of Appeals decision in the People v Koon case, which ruled that even drivers with medical marijuana cards violated the motor vehicle code when driving with THC in their bloodstream. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 5:08 pm
By motion, the People move under CPL Sec. 240.20(2)(b)(v) to compel the Defendant to submit to the taking of oral swab samples from his body for DNA testing and analysis. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:37 am by INFORRM
The ‘zonal argument’ occasionally advanced by tabloid defendants – that an expose is ‘fair game’ because the claimant placed certain elements of information in the public domain – has been long-discredited in English misuse of private information law (McKennitt v Ash [2006] EWCA Civ 1714, Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers [2021] EWHC 273 [86]). [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 3:57 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Supreme Court recently heard arguments in a case, The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]