Search for: "People v. Brown"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 3,383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am
I have students look at the lynching postcards (see the Without Sanctuary website) during a discussion of the legality of lynching.Elizabeth Hoffmann: I show The Road to Brown about the legal and social “paths" leading up to Brown v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:20 pm
” Barney argued that the court, in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:30 am
Riverside Second Order; 1/8/02 Brown v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 4:23 am
The Navajo Nation has been very sensitive about people using their name to promote tacky products. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 1:49 pm
This question has been raised in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 10:12 pm
When the Supreme Court refused to grant cert in Sorich v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:36 pm
Brown and his 'wives' are relying on the Supreme Court's 2003 decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:11 pm
Supreme Court to end segregation in Brown v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Racial segregation in schools (legal until Brown) also served as a barrier to meeting students from different races. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am
As they pointed out, just a few years earlier, in Kazemi Estate v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 5:19 am
See People v. [read post]
Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
Auld Company v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
Those urging caution about bringing the access-to-marriage issue before the Supreme Court note that the Court ducked an interracial marriage case from Virginia the year following Brown v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:29 pm
Cir. 2020), and cites to several cases permitting federal officer removal for elected members of Congress, see Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
See Walker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
App.), writ denied, 883 So.2d 1019, 1020 (La. 2004).Michigan: Brown v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:56 am
Brown, 99 Ohio St.3d 114, 789 N.E.2d 210 (Ohio Supreme Court 2003). [read post]
