Search for: "People v. Green" Results 1321 - 1340 of 2,579
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2014, 5:27 pm
With less than three days to go before the FIFA World Cup’s kick-off [the first match, Brazil v Croatia, is due on 12 June; the final, England v Italy, is surprisingly scheduled only two days later -- the complete calendar can be found here], a focus on the IP-related aspects of the event is in order. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Consistent with the goal of providing delinquent children with treatment designed to achieve rehabilitation as in Matter of Quinton A., Matter of Carmelo E. and Green v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:43 am by WIMS
<> Venancio Aguasanta Arias v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:45 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> US v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:40 am by WIMS
As part of the Federal Green Challenge. . . [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
This makes Greene’s point important enough to deserve a name: How about “agonistic legitimation”? [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:38 am by WIMS
" <> Coal River Energy, LLC v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 11:26 am by Guest Blogger
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights RevolutionJamal GreeneBruce Ackerman’s We the People series is self-consciously about canon formation. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:24 am
 Until now most people - including a number of leading copyright academics - would have easily opted for 'true'. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 12:44 pm by April Glaser
We had the opportunity to talk about how the Free Software Foundation is one of the 22 plaintiffs in our First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles  v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 3:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
., defendant accepted the People's offer to plead guilty to a single count of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree with all the felonies having to be dismissed on the People's motion. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
of how often our beloved copyright is used to scare people off with no apparent reason. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Can make sense in individual cases even with good fair use defenses, but Rothman is concerned that courts incorporate these risk averse customs into their legal analysis—example from Ringgold v. [read post]