Search for: "People v. Haven"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 2,780
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2014, 10:23 pm
If I see a CCIA brief that any significant part of its membership openly disagrees with (such as in Oracle v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
Moreover:(2) You haven't told me what a "reasonable" potential for success is. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 10:33 pm
Ginsburg United States V. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
The case is Jones v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 6:40 am
(See, for example, the court’s use in Patino v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
Zacchini v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:17 pm
We haven’t heard anything on that either. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
These changes will help focus this program on people seeking certainty and relief from criminal prosecution.... [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:01 am
Though I haven’t kept a count, I know that there have been dozens of times when someone would tell me that because they were getting a tax refund they weren’t paying tax. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
New Haven, Conn. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:25 am
Monday’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:05 pm
As Justice Roberts reminded us last week in Riley v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:46 pm
Making that argument required a huge amount of chutzpah, given that everyone knows that liberal lawyers of the sort who populate the Obama Administration DOJ hate the leading case on expressive association, Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:01 pm
You can read that case, Fulgham v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:40 am
Caifornia and United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 11:03 am
If you haven’t been following along, let me bring you up to speed. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Rothrock v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:03 pm
Compare People v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:32 am
Diehr and Alice v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
But I’m not sure that courts will ultimately see this my way; so far they haven’t been inclined to do so, precisely because the exclusion of a mark from federal registration leaves people entirely free to use the mark. [read post]
