Search for: "People v. Hering (1999)"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2008, 7:45 am
Here is another one:The Court of Appeals of Kansas' recent opinion in State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
It appears that Georgia attorneys representing injured people may have to give up on direct attacks on the state adoption of Daubert, and do the harder work in each case of beating defense Daubert motions and making offensive use of Daubert against defense expert. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
What meaning this old ruling, Perez v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:29 am
Quite a fact pattern here: Constellation Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 7:29 am
Reid Nelson from the Capital and Conflicts Appeals Office won in State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:39 am
Other critiques couched in greater or lesser hyperbole can be found here, here, here, and here.So what can we belated latecomers add? [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 10:33 pm
- People are somewhat anonymous on the internet. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:49 pm
OAKLAND, California -- The trial of People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Amgen, Inc., No. 07-1999 "In an action against defendant charging fraudulent pricing of pharmaceutical drugs in violation of Wisconsin state law, an order remanding the case and sanctioning defendant is affirmed in part as to the remand order, but reversed as to the sanctions where: 1) the filing of a suit under the False Claims Act did not render this case removable; and 2) the paucity of appellate authority on the removability issue gave defendant a reasonable basis for removing the… [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
" Id.So we're reduced to reading tea leaves here - but with Lohr that's not unusual.With respect to these rather undefined "parallel" claims, the Court in Lohr held that "[n]othing in 360k denies [a state] the right to provide a traditional damages remedy for violations of common-law duties when those duties parallel federal requirements. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
Cir. 1999) (citing Bandag, Inc., 750 F.2d 903, 924 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 9:39 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 12:30 pm
Bosede v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Recidivism rates vary based on the type of offense and other risk factors such as offender age, degree of sexual deviance, criminal history, and victim preferences (Hanson & Bussiere, 1998; Hanson & Thornton, 1999). [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 1:12 pm
For cases try Gay v Sheeran & Anor [1999] EWCA Civ 1621 or Newlon Housing Trust v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 1:19 am
Click here to go to www.nylj.com People, respondent v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:37 pm
Here, Andyarujina recalls a quarter-century old precedent for this episode: in Sudipt Mazumdar v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 9:37 am
People v. [read post]
