Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 19,098
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2008, 10:51 am
People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:37 am
The ‘zonal argument’ occasionally advanced by tabloid defendants – that an expose is ‘fair game’ because the claimant placed certain elements of information in the public domain – has been long-discredited in English misuse of private information law (McKennitt v Ash [2006] EWCA Civ 1714, Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers [2021] EWHC 273 [86]). [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:39 am
Brevity is the soul of wit, and it goes a long way in appellate opinions, too. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
Detective Hackney testified that he believed no warrant was necessary as long as the GPS was not hard wired, and that as long as it was placed in a public area, it was essentially just like a surveillance. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 3:57 pm
Supreme Court recently heard arguments in a case, The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 12:00 pm
News Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html This week, in brief: 'A long journey for our people': Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians on cusp on federal recognitionMajority of U.S. states, 75 members of Congress and more than 30 organizations file amicus briefs in support of Native American families and childrenU.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 5:10 pm
ObamaJewel v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:08 pm
Haaland (National Historic Preservation Act; Religious Freedom Restoration Act)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlPetitioner/Cross-Respondent: The People of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of Minor Children: K.C. and L.C., v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 11:46 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:51 pm
In a divided opinion in People v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:09 am
--Court: Court of Appeal of Florida, Second DistrictOpinion Date: 9/10/10Cite: Atomic Tattoos, LLC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am
” Lord Sumption distinguished the facts of Mr Catt’s appeal from those in MM v United Kingdom, and the decision of the Supreme Court in R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, in that: “[t]here has been no disclosure to third parties, and the prospect of future disclosure is limited by comprehensive restrictions. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:27 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
It would be difficult for most British people to identify any right that is objectionable (unless, perhaps, they are in favour of the death penalty). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm
And too long and complicated [36], and “unacceptable” [52]. [read post]
13 May 2008, 6:25 am
In People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
For more about the People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Critics sometimes analogize Roe to Dred Scott v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
No. 09–0724 CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT and EMC INSURANCE COMPANIES v. [read post]
