Search for: "People v. Mines" Results 1321 - 1340 of 1,929
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2012, 3:42 pm by nflatow
 Since the Court decided Katz v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 That means making decisions based not on preconceived notions about what seems to be a tough response to terror but rather upon what will actually enhance the security of this country and the safety of the American people. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 2:32 am by SHG
We have no excuse.Finally, it doesn't matter whether your point agrees or disagrees with mine, a detail that causes more anger than any other. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 8:19 am by Eric
Unfortunately, the last sentence reminds me a little of the gratuitous dicta in Tiffany v. eBay about "willful blindness," which trademark plaintiffs have already started to mine. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:11 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
They asked the Delaware Chancery Court to review the “entire fairness” of the transaction, per Kahn v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by Ken
For a sense of just how badly wrong Marc is about the scope of the First Amendment, consider the recent dismissal of the twitter-stalking case in U.S. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:36 am by Alfred Brophy
 He quotes Kramer's discussion of the 1958 decision in Cooper v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:10 am by Edward Hartnett
On Tuesday, December 6, the Court heard argument in a case – Martel v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:28 am by NBlack
” Just a month prior to this arraignment, the Town of Webster Justice Court addressed a very similar issue in People v. [read post]