Search for: "People v. Speed" Results 1321 - 1340 of 2,274
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2015, 4:15 am by familoo
I have been asked specifically to write about it via twitter, so here is a bit of context to help people understand what it’s all about. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:44 am by Kevin
Now, reasonable people might disagree about the answer to that question. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 9:36 am
"It helps prevent convicting innocent people when you say, 'Here's my file. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:41 pm by Bert Louthian
Approved types include Type I, II, III, or V PFD. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 6:16 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Overall, the number of people killed on bikes is up 12 percent, while pedestrian and teen driver deaths are up 10 percent, distracted driver deaths are up 9 percent, motorcycle accident fatalities spiked by 8 percent, child deaths are up 6 percent and alcohol and speed-related crashes are up 3 percent. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:21 pm by Marie Louise
Lawyer says YES (TorrentFreak)   US Copyright – Decisions Another case dismissing hundreds of Doe copyright defendants as improperly joined: Light Speed Media Corp. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:33 am by Russ Bensing
  Within minutes, a car driven by Higuera speeds around from the back, and is intercepted. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
– General Court rejects appeal concerning speed reducing gearbox Case T-246/10 Francisco Ivars v OHIM – Motive intervening (Class 99) Nike in General Court: DYNAMIC SUPPORT and VICTORY RED: T-512/10, T-356/10 (Class 46) General Court: PIPELINE and absolute grounds: T-87/10 (Class 46) Is territoriality dead? [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 12:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  But the actual outcome of the case known as Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:51 pm by Kevin
Or so said Justice Scalia, answering a nutty hypothetical question he asked himself whilst concurring in Mullenix v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In particular, the legislature was clearly reacting to an ordinance enacted in February by the city of Charlotte, which added “lesbian, gay and transgender” to the list of protected traits for antidiscrimination purposes and provided that transgender people can use public restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. [read post]