Search for: "People v. White"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 7,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
” LSE Media Policy Project had a post “George Floyd, racism, white privilege and the media”. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 10:06 am
The lout in the White House famously proclaimed, upon taking office, that the laws of conflict of interest don't even apply to him, so that it is irrelevant that he is clearly flouting, at the very least, the spirit of the Emoluments Clause and conflict of interest statutes. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 10:40 am
The truth is the media covers up horrific numbers of racist hate crimes against White people! [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:44 pm
Although the legal analysis here can be intricate, the basis for the 1982 amendments was the kind of “objective” test continually promoted by Justice White for the Supreme Court in voting rights decisions like White v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 7:28 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Under the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 4:25 am
Over here the UK Supreme Court gave judgment in Lee v Ashers in October following a hearing in May this year also deciding in favour of the baker. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 9:37 am
From Judge Stephen V. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 7:17 am
People v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:16 am
” This racialized science continues in medical education, with students and physicians still reporting a belief that “Black people’s nerve endings are less sensitive than white people’s nerve endings. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 11:40 am
Plaintiff alleged that his right to practice his religion of white witchcraft was infringed by the rule. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
In People v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 9:49 pm
The California Supreme Court’s decision in People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Justice Harlan dissented, joined by Justice White. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 11:38 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
But the courts want you to produce evidence of these discriminatory motivations that many plaintiffs are unable to deliver.The case is Tassy v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:45 am
I, No. 7 — via Four Peaks Advisors Manager Maude Why It’s So Important that Employees Share Your Values — via Workology Yes, I Have a F***ing Problem With People Who Swear at Work — via Fistful of Talent A Winning Parental Leave Policy Can Be Surprisingly Simple — via Harvard Business Review Trump v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:15 pm
While public schools can regulate student speech that substantially disrupts the functioning of the school, as the Supreme Court held in the landmark 1969 case Tinker v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 8:05 am
As she is moving the white board, the entire display falls on her. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:30 pm
” Abdo and others also cite Davison v. [read post]
