Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 2,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
Electric Power Supply Association 14-840Issue: Whether the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission reasonably concluded that it has authority under the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
A registry will be created by IMPI with the aim of recognizing GIs and AOs protected abroad, in accordance with the international treaties and the provisions established in Chapter V. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:15 am
With respect to inducement, although the opinion is silent on who the officers were inducing to infringe, the patentee’s brief indicates that its theory was that the officers induced the corporation’s direct infringement, similar to the circumstances in Power Lift, Inc. v. [read post]
Keep Your Hooves off My Easement! Exclusive Easement Prevents Servient Landowner from Using Driveway
17 Dec 2008, 7:31 pm
(Pasadena v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 2:27 pm
(Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, March 19, 2021, Tetragon Financial Group Limited v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:33 am
Holder and Nix v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am
Holder (2013) as an egregious instance when Republican judges helped Republican political fortunes, but not Janus v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
It is not uncommon for the state apparatus itself to be impeached by the people as a core political act; but the state protects its own apparatus through an ideology of law that vests the legitimate power to impeach (like political power) only in itself. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 1:10 am
Chapter V of the Regulation authorizes public sector bodies and Union institutions, agencies or bodies to request access to data from data holders if they demonstrate an “exceptional need” to use the data requested. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:45 am
Structurally, the draft Directive is organized into five Titles, containing General Provisions (I), rules on CMOs (II), MTL (III), Enforcement Measures (IV), and Reporting and Final Provisions (V). [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
Next, [he] would request an actual payoff figure from the true mortgage holder. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 11:56 am
That was basically the issue in Euro-Excellence v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
” Ashcroft v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:40 am
This morning Advocate General Cruz Villalón delivered his Opinion in Case C‑583/12 Sintax Trading OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus, a request to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus, Estonia. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 12:56 pm
Unfortunately, last June, the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:23 am
Related Cases: Oracle v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:44 pm
We certainly could not do worse, and we most likely will do far better.Make the "power to coin money" (Art. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 3:39 am
In my opinion, this is a powerful argument in favor of a rehearing. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:07 am
The UK Court of Appeal took this matter on earlier this summer, giving trademark holders something to chew on.The case of Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd (t/a Allen & Hanburys) v Sandoz Ltd concerned a trademark registration for an asthma inhaler, and more specifically, its color scheme. [read post]
