Search for: "Powers v. State"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 37,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2018, 3:00 pm
The petition of the day is: SWC, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
What does the Court's opinion now mean for the method of determining the President’s exclusive powers? [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm
The petition of the day is: McDonnell v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
United States, a per curiam three-judge district court held that the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act violated the separation of powers because the statute had given the Comptroller General executive powers and Congress previously held the qualified power to remove the Comptroller for cause. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Some time ago, I reported on Crowell v. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am
That was the difficult question the Supreme Court had to grapple with in the case of R(C) v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 10:13 am
By Matthew Hinks State density bonus law -- one of many California statutes enacted to implement the state's policy of promoting the construction of affordable housing -- has withstood a significant challenge posed by the County of Napa (the "County") in a new California Court of Appeal opinion, Latinos Unidos del Valle de Napa y Solano v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
California Public Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:08 am
The Harris v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:57 pm
The Ninth Circuit struck down the State law earlier this year, partly on the grounds that it intrudes on the federal foreign affairs power. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 7:09 am
Daprizio v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:30 pm
In dealing specifically with the power of investment and the area of ethical investments, the court stated that the power of investment must be exercised to produce the best return for the beneficiaries and maximise financial return as a starting point. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 6:15 am
Additional Resources: Gonsalves v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
On the other hand, prosecutors wield significant power in the form of prosecutorial discretion, so their choices should subject to more thorough public scrutiny and criticism. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:18 pm
Serious evaluation of the scope of the conditional spending power is long overdue, for it remains the easiest possible device for the federal government to force states to comply with federal mandates by dangling federal cash in front of financially strapped states. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:00 am
Ecuador for Investor-State Arbitration. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
” It was important for the House to enhance the judiciary committee’s subpoena powers in 1974 and 1998 because of the state of the chamber’s rules at the time. [read post]
15 May 2020, 2:36 pm
United States and Skilling v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
In Gonzales v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 8:57 am
Actually, the petition is captioned Upstate Citizens for Equality v. [read post]
