Search for: "Prince v State"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,431
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2009, 10:00 pm
Levine" -- slated for publication in the Ohio State Law Journal:"This Article addresses the Supreme Court's recent preemption decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:24 am
Briscoe, et al., v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:34 am
If we have viability at 21 weeks, he says, shouldn't that help further erode the framework of Roe v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:36 am
For some counties, round trip is going to be 10 to 12 hours to testify" for the lab analyst to travel to court.Burns said 42 states and the District are affected by the Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 3:17 pm
" The Fourth Circuit's split decision in Powell v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
See Prince v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:08 pm
The opinion they joined (in another 5-4 decision with just this lineup) in Iqbal v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 1:07 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAdmiraltyCourt Vacates Maritime Attachment for Failure To State Valid Maritime Claim Under English LawKulberg Finances Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
The first question was whether the issue was one of substantive state law (the state of Florida), or a procedural matter under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:15 pm
In No. 08-640, Federal Insurance Co. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:49 pm
Currently only as a note on Lawtel or ALL ER, R (Prince) v Social Security Commissioners & SoS for the DWP & London Borough of Southwark (Interested parties) (2009) QBD (Admin), concerns what can only be described as a bit of a chancer. [read post]
7 May 2009, 10:14 pm
Barnes v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:06 pm
Stanford student Beverly Moore previews Polar Tankers v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 10:33 am
Lacey Mills v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 12:10 pm
For a case that might make a good discussion or exam question, see Prince & Princess Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
This is the third in the four-part series from the brain injury case of Gregory Joseph Gagnon, et al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:53 pm
The article discusses a recent California district court decision, Lenz v. [read post]
