Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 5,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2019, 12:01 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Jan. 7, 2002, orig. proceeding) (not designated for publication). [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:48 am
Co. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
For publication opinions today (3): In Star Transport, Inc. and Jeffrey Cottingham v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:18 am
United States. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
IB DOES NOT PROVIDE ADVISORY SERVICES TO IB CUSTOMERS AND WILL NOT PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR TRADING OR TAX ADVICE REGARDING THE ACCOUNT. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:33 am
Co. of Am., Inc., 297 N.J. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:40 pm
The court noted at the outset of its analysis the general standard for service in New York, adopted from Mullane v. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 8:07 pm
Miami Herald Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
For the second charge, the notice stated that [CO] engaged in 36 unapproved phone calls over a time period spanning six months. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
For the second charge, the notice stated that [CO] engaged in 36 unapproved phone calls over a time period spanning six months. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 8:16 am
In Zubik v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 4:38 pm
The indictment centers on actions by Burke and an alleged co-conspirator to access two servers belonging to a sports network and a television livestreaming service respectively. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
”State of Missouri, et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 7:07 am
In Federal Insurance Co. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm
Starbucks Coffee Co., 2017 WL 2813864, at *1 (9th Cir. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
No “anti-arbitrating” presumption to resolving grievances alleging a violation of a collective bargaining agreementWatertown CSD v Watertown Education AssociationIndian River CSD v Indian River Education AssociationCourt of Appeals, Nos. 50 & 51, joint decision issued 93 NY2d 132In numerous decisions, New York State courts have frowned on the use of arbitration to settle disputes between public employers and unions unless the collective bargaining… [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:21 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June… [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
., Appellant, v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
