Search for: "Range v. Attorney General United States" Results 1321 - 1340 of 1,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2011, 9:03 am by Ronald Collins
His 1967 book, Benchmarks, was profoundly thoughtful and covered topics ranging from Erie v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:00 am by Amy Howe
  One of the first out of the box was Ken Cuccinelli, the attorney general of Virginia, who filed in a federal trial court in that state; the lawsuits that followed included ones filed by Florida and a group of twenty-five other states, Liberty University, a group of small businesses, and the Thomas More Law Center (a Christian non-profit law firm). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:13 am by admin
United States that courts need to review reasonableness of sentences under a deferential abuse of discretion standard, regardless of whether that sentence is inside or outside the guidelines range. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am by John Elwood
Certiorari-stage documents Petition for certiorari Memorandum for the United States   Wetzel v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Like the United States Supreme Court, there are few cases the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is required to hear; instead, the court decides, at its discretion, which appeals from the intermediate appellate courts it wants to hear. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:46 am by Daniel Martin
Myers II, a former assistant United States attorney who is now an associate professor of law at the University of North Carolina. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 8:29 am by Kelly Buchanan
He still faces a civil trial in the United States brought by his accuser, Nafissatou Diallo. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Joshua Matz
  The Hill discusses some of the amicus briefs filed recently in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:13 am by WSLL
Phillips, Attorney General; Terry L. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
P. 60(b)(6); (4) whether a reasonable jurist could believe that the Texas Attorney General made material misrepresentations that constitute a fraud on the court; (5) whether imposition of the death penalty in this case was arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
P. 60(b)(6); (4) whether a reasonable jurist could believe that the Texas Attorney General made material misrepresentations that constitute a fraud on the court; and (5) whether imposition of the death penalty in this case was arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
Part I: SLAPPS – A Weapon Against Public Participation During the 1970s SLAPPs were recognized for the first time as a legal phenomenon in the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
   United States v. [read post]