Search for: "SEC v. Downe" Results 1321 - 1340 of 1,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/4avwrhj (Stephen Arnold) Judge Scheindlin Rules That Metadata is Integral Part of ESI, Admonishes Counsel for Failing to Meet and Confer Concerning Form of ESI Production - http://tinyurl.com/4ul9xmm (Jennifer Hradil) Gavel to Gavel: Pitfalls of Monitoring Social Media - http://tinyurl.com/6j3o8uz (Byrona Maule) Government Appeals and Seeks a Stay of Judge Scheindlin’s FOIA Order on Metadata in NDLON v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:37 pm by Tamar Weinrib
This directive provided the SEC with an opportunity to negate or meaningfully water down the Supreme Court's holding in Morrison v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:27 pm by cdw
What the opinion, in practical terms, means is that DNA testing, even if unavailable under a sec. 2254 or sec. 2255 proceeding, may nonetheless be sought in certain circumstances in a federal civil rights suit. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:45 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Law art. 6, secs. 84-90).In  In the Matter of the New York Civil Liberties Union v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:00 pm by Adam Thierer
Download my comments here or just scroll down and read them below. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:41 pm by Joel Bolstein
  I've had a client or two whose on-site project manager threw an F bomb at a PADEP site inspector, and I've always counseled them to sit that person down and explain that is not acceptable behavior. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 7:39 am by Theo Francis
” When five executives at one firm, in less than a decade, pull down more than the SEC spends in a year, it certainly puts the funding debate in perspective. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 12:42 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
According to an SEC proposal announcement last week, SEC registered managers will be required to file proposed Form PF with the SEC on either a quarterly or annual basis in the future. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:25 am
Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]