Search for: "SELLERS v. STATE"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 3,988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2012, 5:10 pm
(citing State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:52 am
Here, in Zautner v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm
Wood of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is one of those judges. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
Sellers, the justices held 6-3 that a federal habeas court reviewing an unexplained state-court decision on the merits should “look through” that decision to the last reasoned state-court decision. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 10:29 am
And in Wednesday's decision in Dalbeck v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 3:14 am
Craig & Bishop, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 2:05 pm
For example, in Tiffany v eBay, Tiffany & Co. sued eBay after filing thousands of take-down notices with eBay for counterfeit jewelry products, claiming that eBay had knowledge of sellers infringing Tiffany’s mark yet continued allowing infringing sellers on their website. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 3:28 pm
The unsigned opinion in Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm
Case citation: Howell v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:07 am
Unigate Enterprise, Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Nos. 14-16701, 9 February 2017A seller of computer aided design (CAD) files used for steel detailing services could have infringed a software provider’s CAD program by downloading an unauthorized copy of the program, the U.S. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 6:42 am
Obesity Research Institute, LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 1:02 pm
Tonkovic, J.D.State law claims alleged in a complaint against a seller of convertible notes were precluded by SLUSA and must be dismissed, a district court has found. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:31 am
This was recently reaffirmed in Dion v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
In Copeland v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
NBTY, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:24 am
The US Supreme Court today decided in Bilski et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
On 21 November, in Rugby Football Union v Viagogo Ltd [2012] UKSC 55, the UK Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeals' order for the disclosure of the identities of individuals who had used an online ticketing website to sell and purchase international rugby tickets at inflated prices in breach of the Rugby Football Union’s (RFU) ticket terms and conditions. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 4:35 am
Copyrights Meet Politics: Joe Walsh (Rockstar) v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:35 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union has issued its decision in the matter of Coty Germany v Parfümerie Akzente. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 5:30 am
SEC v. [read post]
