Search for: "STEVEN LITTLE" Results 1321 - 1340 of 4,294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2016, 6:53 am
" At the "Democracy in America" blog of The Economist, Steven Mazie has a post titled "Birth control and justice: Little Sisters of the Poor take aim at Obamacare's contraceptive mandate. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:14 am by Edward Smith
Bring your friends, family and little ones to the Annual Galt Eggstravaganza this Saturday. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 4:46 am by Andrew Keane Woods
  Efforts to decouple law’s obligations from their ability to “make a statement” are surprisingly common and – perhaps even more surprisingly – little-studied. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:01 am by Eugene Volokh
There was little formal business on the agenda for that meeting, as the focus was the celebration of our reelection. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:42 am by Paul Berman
It is true that anyone, from any political perspective, might get a little giddy or silly at the prospect of violence. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 11:35 am by Dave Wieneke
For instance, consider Steven Covey’s first imperative, to start with the end in mind. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Most of those interviewed by the Post suggested that Srinivasan's faith would have little impact on the positions he would take on the Court. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 4:30 am by SHG
All three of us agreed on how terrible the majority opinion of Justice Stevens was and how enlightened Justice Scalia’s dissent was. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 12:17 pm by Podhurst Orseck
“We were not ready to waive our rights given how little is known at this stage. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:16 am by Amy Howe
” Commentary on last week’s order blocking enforcement of a Louisiana abortion law comes from Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress and Steven Mazie of The Economist. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:17 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
The perceived public harms from holdups based on invalid or non-infringed patents help explain, for instance, states' recent efforts to regulate "bad faith" patent assertions.Wouldn't a successful challenge to a patent that has little actual commercial relevance potentially halt the patent-owner from wielding that very patent against others in future? [read post]