Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 21,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2023, 8:34 am
References below to legislation are to ITEPA unless stated otherwise. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
The breach reportedly affected online sales data from 2018-2020, including personally identifiable information. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
On 7 February 2023, President Joe Biden gave his 2023 State of the Union Address. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:12 am
Is this case, Cave v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:35 am
For example, in Patoni et al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:27 am
Yearslong lax internal procedures at the Supreme Court could have led to the leak of the draft opinion reversing Roe v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
And by a Decision & Order dated December 15, 2022, the AD1 determined that, pursuant to state law, the monies rightfully belonged to the party that paid the tax. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:42 pm
The post The Strange Case of United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm
In Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 6:11 pm
MAUTHE V. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Victoria’s Secret v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:49 am
The ruling is the latest significant decision dismantling a gun restriction in the wake of the Supreme Court’s expansion of Second Amendment rights last year in the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:01 am
See SEC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
As one House Committee Report stated, exempt offerings should be “a specific or an isolated sale of…securities to a particular person”[10] and were intended for limited transactions “where the public benefits are too remote. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 2:09 pm
This is not, they say, run-of-the-mill state regulation of in-state sales: "Though Proposition 12 applies to sales of pork meat in California, its practical effects are almost entirely extraterritorial. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
Kaye v Lees (2023) EWHC 152 (KB) We’ve seen previous instalments in this matter here and here. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am
” SB 118: UC Enrollment Changes Not A CEQA “Project” Senate Bill 118 was the State Legislature’s targeted response to Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
For example, the plaintiff in Bulun Bulun v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
Rhodia’s strongest argument on appeal (Arnold LJ stated “I acknowledge that this argument has some force”) was that these three factors did not justify the conclusion that the infringing acts were not a proximate cause of the lost sales. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:47 pm
Landry’s, Inc. v. [read post]
