Search for: "See v. See" Results 1321 - 1340 of 122,076
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Supreme Court Rejected an Attack on Medication Abortion, But the Fight Is Far From Over.
18 Jun 2024, 11:44 am by Julia Kaye
FDA are organizations and doctors who want to see all abortion banned nationwide. [read post]
ACLU News & Commentary - https://www.aclu.org/news/
Facebook Defeats BIPA Face-Scanning Lawsuit–Zellmer v. Meta
18 Jun 2024, 9:19 am by Eric Goldman
So I’ll be interested to see how influential this opinion becomes. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Democratic Mobilization for Climate Justice in the Disformation Age
18 Jun 2024, 9:00 am by am33013w
Perhaps one day decisions like Citizens United v. [read post]
Pace Environmental Law Review Blog - https://pelr.blogs.pace.edu/
The Hawai’i Youth Climate Trial
18 Jun 2024, 7:50 am by Evan George
Both states are seeing the dramatic effects of climate change. [read post]
Legal Planet - https://legal-planet.org/
Annulment Instead of Divorce in Maryland
18 Jun 2024, 7:49 am by Monica Scherer
See Morris v. [read post]
Maryland Divorce Lawyer Blog - http://www.marylanddivorcelawyerblog.com/
In order to qualify for retirement benefits under Retirement and Social Security Law Article 15, an applicant for such benefits must demonstrate that he or she actually retired from public service employment in the first instance
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 194 AD3d 1222, 1225 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Turdo v Assessor of the Town of Vestal, N.Y., 205 AD3d 1102, 1103 [3d Dept 2022]). [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
In order to qualify for retirement benefits under Retirement and Social Security Law Article 15, an applicant for such benefits must demonstrate that he or she actually retired from public service employment in the first instance
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 194 AD3d 1222, 1225 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Turdo v Assessor of the Town of Vestal, N.Y., 205 AD3d 1102, 1103 [3d Dept 2022]). [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
"The Biden campaign seems to believe that journalists should stop reporting on polls, rallies, and other tentpoles of traditional presidential races..."
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
See Murthy v. [read post]
Althouse - https://althouse.blogspot.com
[Eugene Volokh] California Judge Orders Removal of Reddit Criticism of Scientist/Consultant Who Publicly Criticized English Lucy Letby Murder Trial
18 Jun 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
(See, e.g., Curcio v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
6 More States Fend Off Enforcement of Title IX Transgender Discrimination Rules
18 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
In State of Tennessee v. [read post]
Religion Clause - http://religionclause.blogspot.com/
Blog Post: LGBTQ Workplace Law Compliance: Comply with Pride
18 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Sherica Celine
See Maia v. [read post]
Legal Insights Blog - https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/
Blog Post: It Aint Over Till It’s Over. Post-confirmation Jurisdiction
18 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Sherica Celine
Post-confirmation Reporting Chart See chart for links to the U.S. [read post]
Legal Insights Blog - https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/
Denied Under the Muslim Ban? It’s Time to Reopen Your Case Thanks to Recent Court Victory
17 Jun 2024, 3:09 pm
Alejandro Mayorkas, et al. and Pars Equality Center, et al. v. [read post]
ImmigraTrust Law Blog - https://www.immigratrust.com/blog
U.S. v. Rivera-Valdes (9th Cir. - June 17, 2024)
17 Jun 2024, 2:40 pm
I suspect the vote will be close either way.And then the Supreme Court may well take the case up.In short, I suspect this is very much not the last word on this subject.We'll see. [read post]
California Appellate Report - http://calapp.blogspot.com/
Court Rules in Favor of Tamara Williams in Social Media Copyright Infringement Case Against Rejuvenate Austin
17 Jun 2024, 1:38 pm by H&A Newscaster
” See Dun & Bradstreet Software Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
Higbee & Associates News - http://www.higbeeassociates.com/news/
What does "excusable neglect" mean under the Federal Rules?
17 Jun 2024, 12:46 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That is what happened here.The case is Doe v. [read post]
Wait A Second! - http://secondcircuitcivilrights.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] "What Happens … When Two School Employees Suspect That Their Colleague is Under the Influence
17 Jun 2024, 11:11 am by Eugene Volokh
Ky.) in Lawson v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Is Promotion of Free Services "Commercial Speech" for First Amendment Purposes?
17 Jun 2024, 10:33 am by Eugene Volokh
See, e.g., Del Castillo v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/