Search for: "Sg."
Results 1321 - 1340
of 2,350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2011, 11:18 am
[JURIST] UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon [official profile] urged Myanmar to release political prisoners in a meeting Monday with pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi [JURIST news archive] and a Myanmar government minister, according to a statement [text] by Ban's spokesman. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:20 am
Wie bereits berichtet kassiert das BGer das Urteil des HGer SG wegen einer Verletzung des rechtlichen Gehörs. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:55 am
I am grateful to God that I had this opportunity (to serve as SG),” Subramanium told PTI when contacted. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 7:50 pm
To no one’s surprise, the SG has waived the United States’ right to respond to the military pro se IFP cert petition in White v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:47 pm
That the SG did not argue that Leal was prejudiced seemed quite important in the Court’s rejection of the stay: We decline to follow the United States’ suggestion of granting a stay to allow Leal to bring a claim based onhypothetical legislation when it cannot even bring itself to say that his attempt to overturn his conviction has any prospect of success. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:34 am
It appears that the SG has allowed the filing deadline to pass without taking action, but there’s sometimes a delay in requests for extensions of cert petition filing deadlines showing up on the e-docket. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 1:46 am
Aside from the SG and members of his office, State Department Legal Adviser Harold Koh and the State Department’s Counselor of International Law Sarah Cleveland are also on the brief. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:33 pm
The SG's brief, filed as amicus curiae or friend of the court, tells the justices that the new bill has "the full support of the executive branch," and that Congress should be given "a reasonable period" to pass it. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:35 pm
The SG’s response is due NLT 29 July, though he will almost certainly waive the United States’ right to respond long before the deadline. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:18 pm
Says Rasmussen. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:19 am
The SG’s request for cert grant was also honored in a petition entered on behalf of the Patent and Trademark Office (Kappos v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
” The Acting SG argued in his brief that issue preclusion was an independent basis to dismiss the complaint in Beer, on the ground that the Beer plaintiffs were unnamed members of the class in Williams v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:26 am
., new SG Donald Verrilli Jr. and White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler, among others. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:40 am
To the best of my knowledge, the SG didn’t request a second extension. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:51 am
[JURIST] UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon [official website] on Thursday condemned [press release] a Bahraini court for sentencing 21 human rights advocates, political activists and opposition leaders to harsh punishments. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
The Court also relisted in a related oldie-but-goodie: the SG’s cert. petition in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am
In the courts (also see the Case Table): BB & Ors v The Home Office [2011] EWHC 1446 (QB) (08 June 2011): Master was wrong to strike out private claims for unlawful detention brought by 4 detainees in Yarlswood detention centre: No need to bring such claims as judicial review SG v St Gregory’s Catholic Science College [2011] EWHC 1452 (Admin) (17 June 2010): School’s ban on “cornrows” hairstyle was indirect race discrimination, therefore unlawful. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 am
SG said I just don’t see a problem with it. [read post]
Breaking News: The SG has asked for an extension of time in which to file a cert petition in Prather
16 Jun 2011, 8:09 am
This doesn’t mean, however, that the SG will file a cert petition; the SG often asks for an extension of time and then decides not to file a cert petition. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm
The SG waived a response in King, and the Court has not called for a response, suggesting the relist may actually be a temporary rescheduling—possibly so the Court can consider King with Hampton v. [read post]
