Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 1321 - 1340 of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:51 pm by Samuel Bray
Professor Nielson describes two arguments made by the Deputy Solicitor General, arguing on behalf of the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:55 pm by William Weinberg
PENAL CODE SECTION 1170 MAY OFFER RELIEF TO THOSE JUVENILES CONVICTED TO LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE I previously discussed the 2012 United States Supreme Court case, Miller v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 5:01 am
In June 2012, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California enjoined Samsung's Galaxy Nexus smartphone because it likely infringed Apple's 8,086,604 patent (the "'604 patent") and because Apple was likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 11:18 am by Brad Kuhn
Kassouni will focus on the California Court of Appeal's decision in Lockaway Storage v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
In response to someone who asked, “I thought that United States currency was legal tender for all debts. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 10:27 am by Unknown
United States (Cultural Resources; Sacred Sites; Chi'chil Biłdagoteel) United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:45 am by Lawrence Solum
Hasen (University of California, Irvine School of Law) has posted The 2012 Voting Wars, Judicial Backstops, And the Resurrection of Bush V. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:56 am
By granting review in yet another state sentencing case, California v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 1:30 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in Heller v. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 7:10 am
The Supreme Court of the United States has announced the cases it will review, and one of those is a sexual harassment case out of Indiana. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 10:32 am by Steven Cohen
Nxtbigthing, LLC – United States District Court – Northern District of California – March 28th, 2016 – In this trademark infringement case, the defendants have filed a motion to exclude the testimony of Joseph A. [read post]