Search for: "State of Florida, Inc." Results 1321 - 1340 of 7,556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2010, 9:45 am
 (SC10-57), the Florida Supreme Court "quashed the decision in Strax Rejuvenation And Aesthetics Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 12:09 am by News Desk
Tampa Bay Fisheries, Inc. of Dover, FL, in partnership with Multiexport Foods, Inc. of Miami, FL, issued a voluntary recall of its smoked salmon twin packs and its 1.25 lb. packs after Listeria was discovered in a sample of the fish. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:31 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
In addition, Florida’s state legislature can delegate the power to other non-governmental entities, including public utilities. [read post]
3 May 2007, 7:38 am
The last post in this series stated that a cause of action for fraud cannot be maintained as a class action in Florida state courts. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:21 am by Adam Weinstein
According to the records kept by the State of Florida, Office of Financial Regulation brokerage firm J.P. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:49 pm
We maintain the State's zero Tolerance Rule. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:34 pm by Law Lady
OCEAN PLACE AT SILVER BEACH ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida Not for Profit Corporation; and FPR FORCE, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Appellees. 4th District.Civil procedure -- Relief from judgment -- Service of process -- Non-residents -- Defects -- Substitute service on Michigan-based defendant through the Florida Secretary of State under section 48.181(1) was insufficient where defendant provided sworn unrefuted testimony that he was not… [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:46 pm by Timothy Kenny (US)
Florida Entertainment Management, Inc., in which the Ninth Circuit found that there is no presumption of irreparable harm in trademark preliminary injunction matters and concluded that the plaintiff must demonstrate irreparable harm to obtain a preliminary injunction in a trademark case. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:32 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
The court held that asserting jurisdiction over San Miguel would violate due process, as the company had not "established minimum contacts" with the state of Florida. [read post]