Search for: "State v Cooper"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 8,564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 2:25 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument last week in a case further exploring the contours of the Miranda warning, J.D.B. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 8:11 am
Sinicropi v Mazurek, 273 Mich App 149 (2006). [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:46 am
by guest blogger Marketa Trimble With the July 14, 2016, decision in Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:15 am
In Hannon v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 9:13 pm
"In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:32 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 12:59 am
Interestingly, with regard to this last issue, the Constitutional Court refers to the CJEU decision C-146/13 Spain v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:31 pm
From O'Handley v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:58 am
And now, citing the First Amendment and the Janus precedent, “three conservative lawyers are seeking to overturn Texas laws that require attorneys to join the State Bar of Texas and pay annual dues;” in Texas, as in many states, bar dues go to various ideologically fraught issues and causes [Chuck Lindell, Austin American-Statesman] Just for fun: Cato’s amicus brief in Janus v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 5:24 am
But nowhere in the California Constitution is the Governor granted explicit authority to concur in this cooperative-federalism scheme. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Because Russia had unilaterally suspended cooperation with the United States under the Hague Service Convention (a fact noted in the discussion of the case of the day from March 4, Baldiga v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:54 am
Miranda v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
By Dan Cooper & Maria-Martina Yalamova On June 6, 2014, the Justice and Home Affairs Council of the European Union (the “Council”), representing individual EU Member States, reached a common position on certain important aspects of the draft European Data Protection Regulation (the “Regulation”). [read post]
22 May 2018, 7:26 am
In Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:57 pm
The rules vary from state to state, though, and are also constrained by the First Amendment. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 11:18 am
Why did the Dominican interest and also of the United States disappear? [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 10:29 pm
They don't make the decision, but both the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) presiding over the investigation and, ultimately, the Commission (the U.S. trade agency's top-level decision-making body) often find the staff's input useful.Discovery disputes between private parties are normal--and it's equally normal that companies being investigated or sued by antitrust enforcers dispute the scope of discovery requests (I've been watching that for a while now in United… [read post]
