Search for: "State v. Flood"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 2,206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2019, 12:45 pm
The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which announced earlier this year that it would review both Lamone v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:27 am
It is therefore crucial that they review the recent decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Downs v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:10 pm
In Pompasi v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:16 am
Likewise, in Jennings v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:44 pm
” Comer v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:12 pm
A second pilot project has been proposed in the State of Ohio in Lake Erie near Cleveland. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 1:15 pm
The case of PENNDOT v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 2:53 pm
The scope of the MLB’s antitrust exemption has been broadened by a series of cases, including the “Business of Baseball” case of Flood v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
This measure required semi-annual surveys up and downstream be submitted to the State’s Office of Mine Reclamation (“OMR”), the County’s Planning and Development Department, and the County’s Flood Control District as part of OMR’s SMARA compliance review. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:53 am
The Los Angeles Times continues the discussion over United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
[Toronto, Ont. : Magistrates' Courts], 1965 KF 224 B568 B53 1965 V.4 Regina vs. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 10:29 am
Today EFF, together with Public Knowledge, filed an amicus brief in Nautilus v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
The District Court, however, declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state law claims and remanded them back to Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
The District Court, however, declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state law claims and remanded them back to Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:58 am
Abbott Save Cayuma Valley v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
" Judge Corley declined to "open the flood gates to prolonged do-over litigation" as opposed to the speedy, efficient, and just resolution that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seek to ensure. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 12:58 pm
Ellison, Ann V. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:21 am
USAA case in Mississippi state court. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
States that used to be covered by preclearance, and even those with less deplorable records, took the Shelby decision as a signal to enact voting restrictions with impunity, and the flood gates were opened to voting discrimination unlike anything the country had seen in a generation. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 1:45 pm
Progress, however, has been interrupted.In 2013, the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby v. [read post]
