Search for: "State v. Items of Property" Results 1321 - 1340 of 2,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2010, 1:51 pm
by Matthew Massari On May 24, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision that may ultimately change the way pro sports teams and leagues can license team-owned intellectual property for merchandise and apparel items. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:51 am by skelly
(v) The availability of the value-added product or service must be based on documented objective evidence and offered in a manner that is not unfairly discriminatory. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
There is evidence that Congresses in the nineteenth century did not view according intellectual property protection to items in the public domain as particularly egregious. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Nor were they limited to taxes on "persons and property," as stated in the Supreme Court's opinion last month in Moore v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 1:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
Chairman Fleming stated the Board has been generous allowing religious group’s use of town property providing it was not a religious type service. [read post]
If an item of property qualifies for both §179 expensing and bonus depreciation, the §179 expensing amount is computed first, and then bonus depreciation is taken based on the item’s remaining income tax basis. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:49 am by Larry
The important legal and possibly philosophical question to be answered in Mondelez Global LLC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:02 am by Eugene Volokh
" The majority focuses on dictionary definitions that describe items or objects that may constitute "rubbish, trash, garbage, debris or other refuse. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:24 am by Kim Krawiec
         A case kicking around back them was United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:07 am by Andree Blumstein
Andrée Sophia Blumstein is the solicitor general of Tennessee, which joined 29 other states in an amicus brief in support of the constitutionality of the cross in The American Legion v. [read post]