Search for: "State v. Light" Results 1321 - 1340 of 25,975
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2012, 7:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
On November 14, 2012, the Yale Supreme Court Clinic, in conjunction with my office, filed a certiorari petition with the United States Supreme Court, asking that the case be heard in light of disagreements among the federal circuit courts about whether the First Amendment prevents public supervisors from disciplining or terminating employees in retaliation for their good faith courtroom testimony. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:02 am by Howard Friedman
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Burwell v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by Howard Friedman
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Holt v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 3:39 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the light of his 2013 convictions, for which the appellant was sentenced to three years’ detention in a Young Offender Institution, the respondent Secretary of State decided that the appellant’s deportation would be conducive to the public good and would not be in breach of his article 8 right to respect for his private and family life. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:50 pm by Stephen Griffin
Because I am teaching a course this fall on the fourteenth amendment, I’ve been meaning to post on the upcoming big case, Fisher v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:32 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States.The orders list had one vacate and remand "in light of the position asserted by the Solicitor General" in Garcia v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 8:44 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Cone v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by ASAD KHAN
“Precarious” was not, in their Lordships’ view, “a term of art” and was similar but not identical to the guidance imparted in Jeunesse v Netherlands (2015) 60 EHRR 17 whereby family life was rendered precarious from the outset where those “involved were aware that the immigration status of one of them was such that the persistence of that family life within the host state would from the outset be precarious. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 11:19 am
  To this non-criminal lawyer (in more ways than one, I hope), the decision did not seem particularly difficult in light of Apprendi v. [read post]