Search for: "State v. Mains"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 10,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2008, 9:19 am
Brewster won in U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 2:01 pm
Article 3(1) of the Regulation states that the courts of the member state in which a debtor has its centre of main interests (“COMI”) shall have jurisdiction to open insolvency proceedings. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 6:02 pm
Maine, 532 U.S. 742 (2001). [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:40 am
Case Citation: Doe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Maryland v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
The Maine State Employees Association ("MSEA") is a union designated by the State of Maine as the exclusive bargaining agent for certain employees of its executive branch. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 1:55 pm
Maine In Jones v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 11:52 am
The other main concern was the relationship between unanimity and the size of the jury. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
But because a “trial court is not bound by the nomenclature used by a party […], the trial court could treat [a motion to suppress] as a motion in limine” State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:29 pm
She cited some cases about corporate responsibility in war crimes, such as Khulumani (United States), Sanader (Croatia), Kiobel v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 8:29 am
First, the Supreme Court's decision in Old Chief v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm
Article III simply declines to abrogate certain State immunities from suit, see Hans v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 6:46 am
The state court’s conclusion that cross‐examination of the state’s main witness’ motive for testifying was a collateral matter was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 4:47 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:31 am
Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 7:26 am
You are not a 'professional landlord' (i.e. you do not have a large portfolio and landlording is not your main business). [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 2:43 pm
Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 749 (2001). [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:15 am
Younger v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 8:44 am
Whereas Judge Rawlinson dissents, saying that in her view, the relevant state court didn't think that Juror No. 2 was deliberately followed by the police on the basis of his holdout status. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 8:10 am
In the 1948 case Morgan v. [read post]
