Search for: "State v. Mart"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 2,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, 2010 WL 419393, at *2-4 (M.D. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:47 am
" Gorham Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
In sum, these rulings, and a similarly pro-corporate, anti-litigant ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:30 pm
– The Volokh Conspiracy Are Historical Cell-Site Data Protected Under the Fourth Amendment After United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Brinker and Dukes v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:30 am
However, in March, the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico ruled in Wal-Mart Puerto Rico v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 7:57 am
As we predicted in our last Report, the impact of changing Rule 23 standards based on Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 8:40 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 359 F. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:31 am
Judge Ludington dissented (Moffat v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:47 am
Concluding there was ample evidence that Walmart was a joint employer of the workers at its warehouse in Mira Loma, California, a federal district court rejected the retailer’s motion for summary judgment on the workers’ FLSA and wage and related claims under state law (Carrillo v Schneider Logistics Trans-Loading and Distribution, Inc, January 14, 2014, Snyder, C). [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 10:11 am
(Eugene Volokh) Montgomery v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Wal-Mart, Inc., 474 F.3d 1214, 1241 (9th Cir. 2007). [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 4:39 am
Like with Citizens United and the Wal-Mart v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
Iqbal (and its precursor, Twombly), Wal-Mart v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:59 pm
” See also United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:59 pm
” See also United States v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:33 am
In Peviani v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 10:44 am
The majority opinion offered a number of examples of admissible expert evidence that would not aid a plaintiff in meeting her burden under Rule 23, including evidence that fails to prove an element of a claim for the entire putative class (citing Wal-Mart v. [read post]
