Search for: "State v. Means" Results 1321 - 1340 of 61,174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2007, 3:16 pm
Virginia to affirm a communicating a threat conviction in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:10 pm by Rumpole
Here is the decision in Graham v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 11:18 am
  Which means we're deporting you.So much for family values, eh? [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:10 pm by Guest Author
Debates and scholarship over what the major questions doctrine is—and what it will mean for administrative law—have proliferated since the Supreme Court’s decisions in Alabama Realtors v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
A nice summary of the meaning of these requirements in the context of criminal law provisions was provided by Lord Hope in R (Purdy) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] 1 AC 345, at paragraph 41: Accessibility means that an individual must know from the wording of the relevant provision and, if need be, with the assistance of the court’s interpretation of it what acts and omissions will make him criminally liable: see also Gülmez v… [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
United States, No. 13-632, and Johnson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:54 am by rhapsodyinbooks
On this day in history, US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for a unanimous Court, ruled in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
Three weeks ago, CAAF granted review in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
At Monday's oral argument in Yeager v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Article I, §10 specifically states that “[n]o state shall . . . pass any . . . [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:16 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
 See Sealed Complaint at 2, United States v. [read post]