Search for: "State v. Olds" Results 1321 - 1340 of 20,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
  As Derek Muller has explained, that practice appears to have begun in 1968, when California and New York refused to include the name of the 33-year-old Eldridge Cleaver to appear on their ballots for President (see Cleaver v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 5:26 am
Meanwhile, in Case No. 11-400, Florida v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 1:11 pm by Patrick E. Knie
Ruling Reverses Decades-Old Medical Malpractice Limitation The post South Carolina Court Rejects “First Diagnosis Rule” in Measuring Medical Malpractice Statute of Repose – Marshall v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:32 am by Miriam Seifter
The opinion overrules a 34-year-old precedent, Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 7:36 am by Sheldon Toplitt
/Dec. 2012, CJR article that updated a 46-year-old Newsweek article that she also claimed was defamatory.In Margaret Won v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 18 – 19 June 2012. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:58 am by Eric Goldman
The court says Title II applies only to “physical facilities” (another cite to the old Noah v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:50 am by Epstein Becker Green
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, some states have banned abortion in all or most circumstances and many more have enacted new restrictions or enforced old ones. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 8:18 pm
It's a death penalty case in which the defendant totally randomly shot two 12-year old girls at in the head with a rifle at a campground, killing one of them (Vanessa Iberri). [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:49 am
On March 31, 2010 the US Supreme Court handed down a 7-2 decision in the case of Padilla v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 10:46 am by Eric Goldman
This Old Gal * 512(f) Claim Against Robo-Notice Sender Can Proceed–Enttech v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 3:02 pm by Bruce Boyden
Apparently the panel conducted a rehearing and the new opinion modifies the old one in a few ways, primarily to bring the opinion in line with the Second Circuit’s opinion in Viacom v. [read post]