Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 11,967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2018, 5:05 am
The Supreme Court in Halliburton II reaffirmed the Basic v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:26 pm
In South Carolina State Board of Dentistry v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 6:14 am
To show that the price fixing challenged by plaintiffs is actively supervised by the state, and therefore immune from the antitrust laws under the state action doctrine, defendants cited ordinances giving municipalities the authority to regulate fees. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 12:33 am
Earlier this month, the Bombay High Court issued its judgment in the case of Price Waterhouse & Co. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 8:25 am
Lobbying Arizona: “In Arizona, lobbyist disclose spending; you just don’t know on whom” by Justin Price in The Arizona Republic Canada: “Lobbying: important amendments to the Lobbyists’ Code of Conduct” by Gregory Kane, V. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm
See Corwin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
Norris v USA: judgment in full "He described the obstruction charge as "subsidiary" to the price-fixing charge that the law lords ruled was not an extraditable offence. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:11 am
The statute preempts state law claims "related to a price, route, or service. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
to see if it could find some soft spot in Georgia state law. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 7:00 am
Pavatt v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:45 pm
(Dale Carpenter) Yesterday, in Doe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:00 am
Inc. of consumer fraud (Danika Gisvold v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:00 am
Inc. of consumer fraud (Danika Gisvold v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 1:48 am
In Millowitz v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 1:48 am
In Millowitz v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 7:12 am
The court was not convinced that the plaintiffs’ allegations that the defendants’ representatives attended meetings where MAPs were discussed met the pleading standard set forth in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 2:19 pm
Sellers in the above examples will want the opposite.The "crystal ball" for the above referenced rule of thumb is the Ohio Supreme Court's ruling in Berea Bd. of Edn. v Cuyahoga Cty Bd. of Revision, 23 Ohio St. 3d 59 (2005). [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 2:42 pm
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit is set to hear oral arguments in November 2024 in Teva v. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 10:16 am
” The court stated that plaintiffs may renew their application if injunctive relief becomes necessary after the expungement proceedings have concluded.The case cite is Price Costco Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:52 am
On the downside, classes at Boalt don't cover NY law for the most part, so you'll have to learn all the state specific stuff during BarBri. [read post]
