Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 13,689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2010, 9:38 pm
McLelland J. did not state any exhaustive test. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:12 pm
California Society of Anesthesiologists v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 1:49 pm
See Diamond Hong, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:30 am
The Board reversed a Section 2(e)(4) refusal to register the mark ROMANÓV for decorative eggs made of precious metals, jewelry, and picture frames, finding that the mark is not primarily merely a surname. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 2:50 pm
Harper – Elections & Gerrymandering United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
The Review Board drew on the test set out in Star Athletica LLC v Varsity Brands Inc (137 S. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 5:09 pm
In Hanlan et al. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
In Powell v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:18 pm
First, this is a case where the plaintiff had a registered copyright in its database. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:27 am
The US Supreme Court will not decide whether retroactive application of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) violates the Ex Post Facto Clause in the ungainly-named case of United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm
The Hearing Officer also looked at the state of the Register and found that the Opponent’s family of marks at its highest consisted of three members, which was not enough to build an expectation in the minds of consumers that the Opponent is the source of all marks containing ‘BOMBAY’ for goods in classes 32 and 33. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm
The Hearing Officer also looked at the state of the Register and found that the Opponent’s family of marks at its highest consisted of three members, which was not enough to build an expectation in the minds of consumers that the Opponent is the source of all marks containing ‘BOMBAY’ for goods in classes 32 and 33. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:23 pm
Compare (a) Standard Register Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
But in Palmore v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:29 am
LLC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
See, e.g., Braun, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
That case, Matal v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:53 am
In Matter of R.B v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 8:55 pm
Recently, a helpful reader directed us to a new Kansas Appellate decision assuaging Scalia's fears by upholding a state law criminalizing bestiality in State v. [read post]
