Search for: "State v. Rhodes" Results 1321 - 1340 of 1,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2022, 4:14 am by Emma Snell
”  Lawyer for Rhodes, Philip Linder, however, argued that Rhodes and his subordinates had never planned an attack against the government on Jan. 6. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
 For reference, the article says that the number of Americans in prison or jail exceeds the population of Rhode Island. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 7:17 am by Greg Herman-Giddens
  Marc has published numerous articles and been quoted in the Forbes.Com, Fox Business, Naval Reserve Association Magazine, Rhode Island Bar magazine, Bradenton Herald, Lawyers USA, and Military.com. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
 For reference, the article says that the number of Americans in prison or jail exceeds the population of Rhode Island. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:58 am by Sandy Levinson
Madison described equal representation in the Senate in Federalist 62 as a "lesser evil" against the greater evil of no Constituion at all, given Delaware's (and other small states') extortionate threats to walk out and torpedo the whole project of constituitonal reformation. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In addition, a number of other states are considering legislation to protect biometric data privacy, including Alaska, Delaware, Florida, Arizona, Hawaii, Oregon, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey and Rhode Island. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence, and were… [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 2:57 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Rhode Island (2001) 533 U.S. 606, the court stated that if the City’s rule were accepted, “[a] state would be allowed, in effect, to put an expiration date on the Takings Clause. [read post]