Search for: "State v. True" Results 1321 - 1340 of 21,787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
Gore, it was as hard to defend state control of federal elections as it was to defend the Court’s arbitrary intervention in a matter of state election law.All this was true in 2000 and remains true today. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
The second part of the judgment then focused on whether such violation was justified by the unique qualities of the property in question, the peculiarities of its discovery, or the Italian State’s interest in preserving the integrity of its cultural patrimony. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 3:34 am by David Whitehead
Lord Sumption pointed out that it was not expressly stated in the ADA that the authority to collect payments was irrevocable, nor was it stated that such an authority should survive termination. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am by INFORRM
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 12:21 pm
 You can file your state claims in state court if you want, as long as the federal claims get filed where they belong. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:31 am
Policy-maker's terminated after spouse sues State alleges violation of a Constitutional right to associate with others in intimate relationshipsAdler v Pataki, 2nd Circ., 185 F.3d 35Although the Second Circuit U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:14 am by Frank Cranmer
In Scottish Federation of Housing Associations v Jones [2022] EAT 114, Ms Jones was Head of Membership and Policy of the Federation. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Accepting the allegations in the complaint as true and affording Brummel the benefit of every favorable inference, the Appellate Division concluded that Brummel "did not state a cause of action to recover damages for defamation as some of the statements alleged to have been made 'do not have a precise meaning' while others are hyperbolic and incapable of being proven true or false. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am by SHG
The Supreme Court’s decision in Regents of the State of California v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am by SHG
The Supreme Court’s decision in Regents of the State of California v. [read post]