Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 40,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2012, 1:32 pm
In Fitzsimons v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 11:44 am
" In other words, the Supreme Court will tackle the knotty question of whether to extend the landmark holding of District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:42 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
" The defendant also cited these statements in State Farm v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]
State v. Outing and Change Blindness: Will the Connecticut Supreme Court Respect Empirical Evidence?
29 Jul 2009, 10:01 pm
In other words, was it a matter of "common sense" to you? [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
D&J Plastics, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:21 pm
See Bell v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 10:28 am
I know, that's jury unanimity, but I think that whenever I see the word "gravamen. [read post]
23 May 2012, 9:46 am
Please ignore my previous words. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:57 am
In other words, the crimes remain state offenses, with state elements. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:52 am
State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 12:09 am
Thus, Edelman v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
But always, always, follow the rules. ___________ Booher v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:23 pm
It is hard to escape the conclusion that the US Congress has entered the intellectual wilderness, a sad state of affairs in a country that has led the world in many scientific arenas for so long. [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 6:00 am
California State Lottery (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 1198, 1203-1204; Janis v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:11 am
Third, Steve asserts that the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces’ decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:53 pm
Yet entirely within the province of a state court, which has the final word on the contours of state law, including but not limited to standing under state law (which may be -- and is -- different than federal standing principles).So, in the end, an interesting opinion less because of who the defendant is and more for what the Court of Appeal actually holds. [read post]
