Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 20,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2007, 11:16 am
Balkin continues: On the other hand, if Roe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 8:16 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Davis v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:25 am
Judges have to overcome their natural bias against legal malpractice and the facts have to be very strong, or the acts of the attorneys very clearly wrong for partial summary judgment to be granted. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 9:54 am
Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 3:21 pm
The case, In re Monarch Consulting, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 8:10 am
They certainly seemed to come to the argument in Merit Management Group v FTI Consulting with a strong predisposition about how to decide the case. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 10:54 am
In an October 2 ruling in Strong v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:24 pm
ShareMonday’s decision in Hughes v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, "repeal of Civil Rights Law §50-a ... reflected a strong legislative policy promoting transparency of police disciplinary records and eliminated any claim of confidentiality in them" (see People v Castellanos, 72 Misc 3d 371)). [read post]
22 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm
Bunk v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 8:00 am
In Holden, drawing from Munn v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, "repeal of Civil Rights Law §50-a ... reflected a strong legislative policy promoting transparency of police disciplinary records and eliminated any claim of confidentiality in them" (see People v Castellanos, 72 Misc 3d 371)). [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
" The Appellate Division then observed that the arbitrator exceeds his or her power where his or her award "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power," citing Barone v Haskins, 193 AD3d 1388, appeal dismissed37 NY3d 1032, lv denied 37 NY3d 919 [see Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
" The Appellate Division then observed that the arbitrator exceeds his or her power where his or her award "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power," citing Barone v Haskins, 193 AD3d 1388, appeal dismissed37 NY3d 1032, lv denied 37 NY3d 919 [see Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:10 am
See SEC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 8:36 am
Today's decision, Porter County Sheriff Department v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 5:30 am
The case of R. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 5:38 pm
A law of privacy in Australia is a strong possibility following the News of the World phone hacking scandal. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:55 am
By Jason Rantanen Sciele Pharma Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 4:10 am
StreetCar ORV, LLC d/b/a American Expedition Vehicles v. [read post]
